Questions, feedback, and updates on the new online store design experience
To continue receiving payouts, you need to secure your account by turning on two-step authentication. If two-step authentication is not turned on your payouts will be paused. Learn more
Hi,
sorry if this is a silly question.
in 2.0 we are nudged towards using meta fields for filtering. For us this job was previously done with tags.
metafields have advantages (ease of use, reduce input errors) but we’ve hit upon an issue.
collections cannot be defined by meta field. This means in order to filter (mandatory) and create collections we need to input things twice.
for example, we want to be able to filter a longer list of clothes to show only jumpers, whilst also having a collection that is ONLY jumpers.
for this to happen so we need to define the product as a jumper in both a meta field and the tag.
this is a duplication of effort.
is there a way around this?
am I misunderstanding?
is there a good reason why you can define a collection by MF?
is there a workaround (flow maybe but even that would require a lot of work to cover all possible MF/tag/collection permutations?
cheers
Learn these 5 things I had to learn the hard way with starting and running my own business
By Kitana Jan 27, 2023Would you love to unleash the unbridled power of the Google Shopping Channel into your sho...
By Gabe Jan 6, 2023How can you turn a hobby into a career? That’s what Emmanuel did while working as a wa...
By Skye Dec 30, 2022