How can I prevent the new indexing bug from creating useless pages on Google?

“pages with noindex” are not problematic, if they are out of the index. The only thing that might need to be monitored is the crawl budget after everything is fixed.

The problem we had/have is “indexed, although blocked by robots.txt”.

The GSC is usually also lagging a few days behind. That’s why it might look like pages are still going to be indexed, which is not the case.

As long as the robots.txt doesn’t block those pages (you can test the affected URLs here) & noindex-Tag is added to those sites (X-Robots or Meta robots, you can test the affected URLs here here), no more pages are going to be indexed.

The only thing you can do to clear the index faster is to go to “indexed, although blocked by robots.txt” in Search Console and start a review. You’ll probably need several runs to get them all out of the index.

@gregbernhardt

“web-pixel-manager URLs will 404 and drop from the index”

How? Is something changing in the future? Right now /web-pixels-manager pages are not blocked in the sitemap, not blocked with no-index tags, and not blocked with x-robots tags. What has changed and how can we verify that it’s actually changed?

I can’t tell google the problem is fixed and have them spend an exorbitant amount of our crawl budget over the next month to see that the pages are still indexable and being served by shopify. Stuff happens. Just be transparent with us and tell us what the roadmap is because saying indexable pages “will 404 and drop from the index” is a promise that seems unrealistic.

@kbarcant can you please DM that link, thanks!

Dm’d.

@Greg-Bernhardt -This issue has draggged on for nearly 3 months. For clarification, can you confirm:

1 - You state that the sandbox url’s are “no-index” in the http header - but when I check one of my product skus url with the sandbox url

https://www.bunkbedking.com/web-pixels-manager@0.0.186/sandbox/products/bunk-beds-tall-stairway-gray-trundle

(see screenshot) it shows that google can index:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/v1gjkjr6wrdunrw/Screenshot%202023-03-26%2010.49.19.png?dl=0

I think part of the problem is that shopify has created many url options of this sandbox pixel and now I have them scattered around in Google Page Indexing - I have versions in:

Blocked by Robots.txt

Crawled - currently not indexed

Excluded by ‘noindex’ tag

Not found (404)

So can you confirm exactly what steps are needed to clean up this mess for each of these 4 categories?

Reading thru your comments, it seems the solution is to do nothing and let the shopify created url fix the issue. If so, you need to go back to all the versions of this sandbox url shopify created and make them not not indexable ie as the wpm@0.0.245@ variant

https://www.dropbox.com/s/83dlit8nj3h96wi/Screenshot%202023-03-26%2011.08.55.png?dl=0

From our side;

We should not add a no-index, no-follow tag in Robots.txt for the sandbox url’s?

We should not disavow the sandbox url’s?

Thanks

Denis

as an aside why was this code not tested before it went live to ensure it functioned correctly?

I’m astounded at the patience of this community. Clearly a lot of knowledgeable people in here who understand the impact of this issue. I don’t have anything to contribute except to add that I have the same issue and have regularly been frustrated with Shopify’s inability to address obvious issues in a timely manner (setting accurate times for shipping zones being one - still unresolved for the UK). It is clear that smaller retailers are all but ignored on this platform.

The problem is still not solved knowing that it is more than 2 weeks old for the number 1 host of ecommerce site it becomes shameful. Each day more is less credibility for all your users. Moreover, even today I still have the Wpm and Web pixel Manager pages that appear but I also have a Chinese URL that was not created by me, which has just been detected. So I’m going to ask users if this is related to the same problem as WPM and if they too have detected this because shopify doesn’t seem to want to help us this PROBLEM, or doesn’t communicate enough which makes everything unclear and very unpleasant.

@Denis_B the pixel URL you provided redirects to https://www.bunkbedking.com/collections/bunk-beds-stairway. You’ll want to investigate why.

@tom511 what report is that screenshot from? The new URL is from search, not web pixel.

Hi @gregbernhardt

The rest of the indexed pages are getting deindexed slowly however I have seen a new indexed page today. Please guide me if there is any index tag that needs to be added like vendors/collections.

https://www.urbanbeauty.pk/search?q=%E5%9C%A8%E7%BA%BF%E9%BE%99%E8%99%8E%E6%96%97%2C%E3%80%90%E8%AE%BF%E9%97%AEK3666%2Ecc%E3%80%91%E6%89%8E%E9%87%91%E8%8A%B1%E6%B8%B8%E6%88%8F%2C%E5%9C%A8%E7%BA%BF%E7%99%BE%E5%AE%B6%E4%B9%90%E6%8A%95%E6%B3%A8%2C%E7%9C%9F%E4%BA%BA%E6%B8%B8%E6%88%8F%E4%B8%8B%E8%BD%BD%2C%E5%9C%A8%E7%BA%BF%E7%99%BE%E5%AE%B6%E4%B9%90%E7%BD%91%E5%9D%80%2C%E5%9C%A8%E7%BA%BF%E7%8E%B0%E9%87%91%E5%BE%B7%E5%B7%9E%E6%89%91%E5%85%8B%2C%E7%82%B8%E9%87%91%E8%8A%B1%E6%8A%80%E5%B7%A7%2C%E7%9C%9F%E4%BA%BA%E9%BE%99%E8%99%8E%E6%B8%B8%E6%88%8F%2C%E6%80%8E%E6%A0%B7%E9%A2%84%E6%B5%8B%E8%B6%B3%E7%90%83%E6%AF%94%E5%88%86%2C%E5%9C%A8%E7%BA%BF%E5%A4%AA%E9%98%B3%E5%9F%8E%2C%E7%9C%9F%E4%BA%BA%E7%BA%BF%E4%B8%8A%E5%A8%B1%E4%B9%90%2C…787d

Thanks for the link @ahsonmkhan , I’ll take this back to the devs

Also please check if we can use this solution for the time being (Read this on another community post)

{% if request.path == ‘/search’ and search.results_count == 0 %}

{% endif %}

@ahsonmkhan yes you can use that. Once implemented, please confirm it’s working.

@ahsonmkhan that page is sending noindex via header but your theme is injecting a robots meta which says to index.

@gregbernhardt This is a bit complicated for me. please suggest should I go ahead with putting that noindex tag in the head section only

or is there anything else that should be done along with it

Hi @gregbernhardt when can we expect shopify to come out with a fix for this…?

Just an estimated date of when the devs can fix this issue that is plaguing many merchants

@Jon can you please articulate the exact issue you are facing?

@Greg-Bernhardt

Hi Greg

Response please to my other questions:

I think part of the problem is that shopify has created many url options of this sandbox pixel and now I have them scattered around in Google Page Indexing - I have versions in:

Blocked by Robots.txt

Crawled - currently not indexed

Excluded by ‘noindex’ tag

Not found (404)

So can you confirm exactly what steps are needed to clean up this mess for each of these 4 categories?

Reading thru your comments, it seems the solution is to do nothing and let the shopify created url fix the issue. If so, you need to go back to all the versions of this sandbox url shopify created and make them not not indexable ie as the wpm@0.0.245@ variant

https://www.dropbox.com/s/83dlit8nj3h96wi/Screenshot%202023-03-26%2011.08.55.png?dl=0

From our side;

We should not add a no-index, no-follow tag in Robots.txt for the sandbox url’s?

We should not disavow the sandbox url’s?

Thanks

Denis

as an aside why was this code not tested before it went live to ensure it functioned correctly?

@Denis_B

Blocked by Robots.txt: These will reduce over time as we removed the block

Crawled - currently not indexed: this report is not an issue in this instance

Excluded by ‘noindex’ tag: this report is not an issue in this instance

Not found (404): this report is not an issue in this instance

We all have lots of [email removed] urls in GSC indexed page. @gregbernhardt Now what is the solution for these pages?

I have the same problem. A lot of blank pages reported by google console related to web pixel sandbox manager. Google is anyway not indexing the pages because “excluded by no index tag”