3 long replies in less than a minute! Dang you’re good! You deserve the copy/paste award 
Fair call — I had prepared the notes in advance and posted several replies back-to-back. The observations were specific to each store, but I can see why the timing looked automated. I’ll slow down. Thanks for flagging it.
Lol you just joined yesterday. Breathe. It’s ok. They’ll still be here asking the same thing next week.
The catalogue analysis above is the right first fix. I’ll add the garment side layer nobody has covered yet, from 20 years on the apparel production end. Online clothing lives or dies on one question: “will it fit me and feel like the photo.” Everything below is about answering that before she has to ask.
Measurements, not letters. A size chart that says S/M/L tells her nothing. Every brand’s M is different, and your catalog mixes suppliers, so your M isn’t even consistent shop wide. Put actual garment measurements (chest, length, hip) on each product, per style. This is the single highest leverage fix for apparel conversion and returns.
Fabric facts on every page. Fiber content and weight, minimum. Something like “95% rayon, 5% spandex, midweight with drape.” Shoppers who can’t touch the garment read these as a proxy for quality, and their absence as a proxy for dropshipping.
Photograph what you ship. If your product photos are supplier stock images, order your top 10 styles, shoot them on a real person or a flat lay, and note anything that differs from the stock shot. Buyers have been burned enough to recognize catalog renders. One authentic photo set outsells ten polished supplier images.
Say the shipping time in days, on the product page. If items ship from an overseas supplier, “7 to 15 business days” stated plainly loses fewer customers than a surprise at the order confirmation email, and far fewer than the chargebacks from unstated three week waits.
None of this costs more than one sample order and a weekend. The store that answers fit, fabric, and delivery honestly is rarer than you’d think, and it reads as trustworthy within seconds.
You’ve gotten great feedback on photos and trust signals already, so I’ll add the one thing I’d fix on the copy side: your store description says “Women’s Clothing and Accessories. Wide range of products.” That sentence could belong to a million stores, but yours actually has a rare advantage (true XS–5X plus a personal stylist).
Quick example of the same information, rewritten to sell:
Before: “Women’s Clothing and Accessories. Wide range of products, and I offer regular and plus-size clothing.”
After: “Clothing that actually fits every piece from XS to 5X, chosen by a personal stylist who knows how fabric behaves on real bodies. No ‘plus section’ hidden in the corner. One boutique, every size.”
Same facts, but now it answers the shopper’s real question: will this work for MY body? At your price points, each product description needs to do the same: fabric stretch, where the hem lands, and whether the waist is forgiving because for curvy shoppers, those details ARE the purchase decision.
This is what I do for a living, so I’m happy to rewrite one full product page here in the thread for free if you want a template to copy across the store.
Hey @Tryiton
hope you’re doing well!
I’d consider buying, but I’d strengthen trust and conversion elements first—more prominent reviews, clearer sizing, shipping/returns information, and stronger product photography. also simplify navigation so shoppers can find products quickly