@JaxBags - glad to hear I am not alone.
Shopify’s transactional partner for their payments is Stripe - yet the experience here is even worse than when it happens with stripe.
My response to shopify was very similar to your own and despite being told they would ask their team for info I simply got told ‘‘I am told that the department passed your comments on’’ or something to that effect.
It isn’t good enough.
I want the name of the bank involved; to suggest that it is data protection to not be able to provide this information is an absolute cop-out when I have succesfully been able to negotiate when the same has happened through my bank terminal.
The fact that shopify applies the deduction to your payments account is SHOPIFY policy, not the bank. Not necesarily that I expect them to be ‘holding the bag’ while the dispute is worked out, but it removes any and all vested interest for any of their customers’ interests (i.e. the shop owners).
Absoultely no care is taken by shopify to show that the issue is properly communicated; evidenced by the fact that you can add one photo and formatting in the response isn’t retained which again erodes any confidence that my documentation has been properly communicated. I specialise in adjudications and commercial disputes and half of the effort in a succesful outcome is properly presenting it - something that shopify can’t show me was done, nor does the way they gather information facilitate.
To this date I haven’t received contact details to corrsepond with the bank. The bank has a vested interest in not letting its customer down, so simply stating that ‘the bank has maintained the decision’ is abhorrent.
@Rick_14 sorry, I had actually avoided responding because once again I find shopify’s answer to be completely unsatisfactory. This is the third time this has happened and it has seen me THOUSANDS out of pocket. My qualm isn’t necessarily that Shopify are a ‘middle man’, it is that Shopify are using this position to completely extinguish any care or diligence to actually assist their customer’s best interests.
For avoidance of doubt, the problems are
- No demonstration that an adequate response has been presented to the alleged bank
- No contact details for the bank involved have been passed on - in a role of a middle man, if you can’t disclose the banks details you should be able to transparently pass through messages
- No assistance or care for an appeals process on the back of a poor outcome
- No evidence that my response has been passed on verbatim, edit in a way that matches the format used.
- A Poor ability to effectively provide a response (How is the ability to upload one image sufficient?)
- No evidence that the above is accurately portrayed to the bank - I had to create a collage of my conversations. Both times the customer claimed a fraudulent transaction - yet I provided emails where they confirmed , tracking details, photos.. and EVEN A photo and email FROM THE CUSTOMER, stating they had received the item. Yet I’m still hit with dispute fees, and a negative, generic outcome that does not match the evidence submitted. Now, either the bank is simply lying which is something that Shopify need to escalate and hold them accountable to; or the data simply wasn’t transferred and communicated clearly - which when I’m limited to attaching an A1 sized document with a collage of emails etc - is understandable - which means SHOPIFY have caused me to loose the dispute - and frankly couldn’t care less.
- Why, after I had responded within a few days to the dispute, does SHOPIFY not pass on the response until the end of their timeline?
It appears that SHOPIFY simply use their position as a middle man to wipe their hands of all care and responsibilities and it is thoroughly dissapointing.
And you know what really frustrates me? After it happened yet again, I was aghast to receive an email from shopify asking ME to justify how I would deal with future fraudulent transactions i.e. by emailing the customer to verify the transaction. I did that each time, and was ripped off not because it was a suspicious transaction; but because the customer simply wanted goods for free and my emails weren’t taken on board.